<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clear The Air Ships Air Pollution Blog &#187; Pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?cat=56&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk</link>
	<description>The impact of ship pollution from a public health approach instead of a quantitative approach.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:02:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ship Pollution Patterns Tracked From Space</title>
		<link>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2539</link>
		<comments>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2539#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=80375" target="_blank">http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=80375</a></p>
<p><img src="http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/80000/80375/globalno2_omi_2012_lrg.jpg" alt="http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/80000/80375/globalno2_omi_2012_lrg.jpg" width="658" height="658" /></p>
<p>For more than a decade, scientists have observed <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=1967" target="_blank">“ship tracks”</a>in  natural-color satellite imagery of the ocean. These bright, linear  trails amidst the cloud layers are created by particles and gases from  ships. They are a visible manifestation of pollution from ship exhaust,  and scientists can now see that ships have a more subtle, almost  invisible, signature as well.</p>
<p>Data from the Dutch and Finnish-built <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/instruments/omi.html" target="_blank">Ozone Monitoring Instrument</a> (OMI) on NASA’s <a href="http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/" target="_blank">Aura </a>satellite show long tracks of elevated <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20%20http:/glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Nitrogen_dioxide" target="_blank">nitrogen dioxide</a> (NO<sub>2</sub>) levels along certain shipping routes. NO<sub>2</sub>, is among a group of highly-reactive <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/www.epa.gov/air/nitrogenoxides/" target="_blank">oxides of nitrogen</a>, known as <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Nox" target="_blank">NO<sub>x</sub>,</a> that can lead to the production of fine particles and ozone that damage  the human cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Combustion engines,  such as those that propel ships and motor vehicles, are a major source  of NO<sub>2</sub> pollution.</p>
<p>The map above is based on OMI measurements acquired between 2005 and 2012. The NO<sub>2</sub> signal is most prominent in an Indian Ocean shipping lane between Sri  Lanka and Singapore, appearing as a distinct orange line against  (lighter) background levels of NO<sub>2</sub>. Other shipping lanes that run through the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea, and the Mediterranean Sea also show elevated NO<sub>2</sub> levels, as do routes from Singapore to points in China. These aren’t  the only busy shipping lanes in the world, but they are the most  apparent because ship traffic is concentrated along narrow,  well-established lanes.</p>
<p>The Atlantic and Pacific Oceans also have heavy ship traffic, but OMI doesn’t pick up NO<sub>2</sub> pollution tracks because the shipping routes are less consistent. The  shapes of landmasses force ships into narrow paths in the Indian Ocean,  while ships in the Atlantic and Pacific tend to spread out over a broad  areas as they navigate around storms.</p>
<p>In addition, the air over the northeastern Indian Ocean is relatively pristine. Heavy NO<sub>2</sub> pollution (dark red in the map) from cities and off-shore drilling  activity along the coasts of China, Europe, and the United States  obscures the ship tracks that might otherwise be visible to OMI. In the  map, the Arctic is gray because the lack of light during the winter and  frequent cloudiness during the summer prevented OMI from collecting  usable data in the area.</p>
<p>Urban areas and industrialization aren’t the only source of NO<sub>2</sub> in the map. <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=9060" target="_blank">Agricultural burning</a> in southern Africa and persistent <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/AfricaOzone/african_ozone2.php" target="_blank">westerly winds</a> make an elevated band of NO<sub>2</sub> that stretches from southern Africa to Australia. (In central Africa,  easterly winds push pollutants from fires toward the Atlantic, keeping  NO<sub>2</sub> levels comparatively low over the northern Indian Ocean.) Lightning, which <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2007/27apr_nox/" target="_blank">produces NO<sub>x</sub>,</a> also contributes to background NO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p>
<p>Just how much shipping contributes to overall NO<sub>x</sub> emissions remains an open question for scientists. Research suggests that shipping accounts for 15 to 30 percent of global NO<sub>x</sub> emissions; scientists are using satellite observations to <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012EGUGA..1410232V" target="_blank">reduce the uncertainty</a> in such estimates.</p>
<p>OMI is not the only satellite instrument observing NO<sub>2</sub> levels in the atmosphere. The <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/The_Living_Planet_Programme/Meteorological_missions/MetOp/About_GOME-2" target="_blank">Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment</a> (GOME) instruments on the European Space Agency’s <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20https:/earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/ers%20%20%20" target="_blank">ERS-2</a> and <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20http:/www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/The_Living_Planet_Programme/Meteorological_missions/MetOp/Overview14" target="_blank">MetOp-A</a> satellites, as well as the <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20https:/earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/envisat/instruments/sciamachy" target="_blank">SCIAMACHY</a> instrument on the <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/%20https:/earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/envisat" target="_blank">Envisat</a> satellite, have made similar measurements. In 2012, Dutch scientists published <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011GL049541/abstract" target="_blank">a study</a> combining data from all four instruments to show that the NO<sub>2</sub> signal over major shipping increased steadily between 2003 and 2008,  then dropped sharply due to the global recession and reduction in ship  traffic.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>References</strong></li>
<li>deRuyter de Wildt, M., H. Eskes, and K. F. Boersma (2012, Jan. 5) <a href="http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1029/2011GL049541" target="_blank">The global economic cycle and satellite-derived NO<sub>2</sub> trends over shipping lanes.</a><em> Geophysical Research Letters.</em></li>
<li>Franke, K., Richter, A., Bovensmann, H., Eyring, V., Jöckel, P., Hoor, P., and Burrows, J. P. (2009) <a href="http://dx.doi.org/%2010.5194/acp-9-7289-2009" target="_blank">Ship emitted NO<sub>2</sub> in the Indian Ocean: comparison of model results with satellite data.</a> <em>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. </em></li>
<li>Vinken, G., Boersma F. (2011) <a href="http://www.knmi.nl/%7Eboersma/papers/Solas_Vinken.pdf" target="_blank">From ship smokestack to global air pollution: bridging the scales to better constrain ship NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from space. (PDF)</a> <em>Solas</em><em> News.</em></li>
<li>Vinken, G., Boersma, F., Jacob, J., and Meijer, W. (2011) <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11707-2011" target="_blank">Accounting for non-linear chemistry of ship plumes in the GEOS-Chem global chemistry transport model.</a> <em>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. </em></li>
<li>Wang, C., Corbett, J., Firestone, J. (2008) <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0700799" target="_blank">Improving Spatial Representation of Global Ship Emissions Inventories.</a> <em>Environmental Science Technology.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>NASA Earth Observatory image by Jesse Allen, using OMI NO2 data provided courtesy of Lok Lamsal, <a href="http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html" target="_blank">Aura Project Science Office.</a> Caption by Adam Voiland, with information from Nickolay Krotkov, Anne Thompson, Geert Vinken, and Folkert Boersma.</p>
<p>Instrument:</p>
<p>Aura &#8211; OMI</p>
<p>Ship Pollution Patterns Tracked From Space</p>
<p>Feb 14, 2013 11:39 AM ET // by <a href="http://news.discovery.com/christina-reed.htm" target="_blank">Christina Reed </a> <a href="http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/ship-pollution-patterns-tracked-from-space-130214.htm" target="_blank">http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/ship-pollution-patterns-tracked-from-space-130214.htm</a></p>
<p>City pollution from cars smogging  your view? Have a look at the coastal pollution in the map shown above.  It’s not an atmospheric pollutant that you can see with your naked eye,  but its presence can lead to cardiovascular and respiratory problems in  humans.</p>
<p>What is it? Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which in elevated amounts lead to unhealthy levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx), fine particles, and ozone in the air we breath.</p>
<p>Just  what is causing this red alert pattern along the coasts? That’s the  rub, it’s a combination of city pollution, off-shore drilling, and ship  traffic.</p>
<p>Ships and airplanes can both leave whispy cloud tracks called “contrails” in the air that are easily seen from space.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/shaving-cream-prank-or-ship-tracks-130125.htm" target="_blank"><strong>Shaving Cream Prank or Ship Tracks?</strong></a></p>
<p>But  the specific amount of NO2 that ships release near the coasts gets lost  among the other emissions of nitrogen oxides from other pollution  sources.</p>
<p>Shipping is estimated to contribute 15 to 30 percent to the global NOx pollution.  To test this, several satellites are monitoring atmospheric NO2 levels.  This map shows the ocean and sea-based contribution of NO2 into the  atmosphere from 2005 to 2012 as measured by a Dutch and Finnish-built  Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on <a href="http://climate.nasa.gov/news/860" target="_blank"><strong>NASA’s Aura satellite</strong></a>.</p>
<p>Take  a look at the difference between the hazy NO2 level drifting between  southern Africa and Australia, the result of westerly winds blowing soot  from fires in Africa across the Indian Ocean, and the distinct red line  along the transoceanic shipping route between Sri Lanka and Singapore.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.discovery.com/human/cruise-passenger-ship-disasters-20130212.htm" target="_blank"><strong>Eight Unbelievable Cruise Ship Disasters</strong></a></p>
<p>Other  areas of the ocean such as in the Pacific and the Atlantic have just as  much shipping traffic, but the routes do not leave such a precise NO2  trail for the satellite to detect, because in those waters ships are  often forced to skirt around storms.</p>
<p>Earth  and climate scientists work with maps like this one to help better  evaluate the human contribution to atmospheric pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2539</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slaughter of the seabirds: Polluting ship feared responsible for killing thousands of birds in Channel</title>
		<link>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2536</link>
		<comments>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2536#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?p=2536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/english-channel-bird-deaths-polluting-1569607" target="_blank">http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/english-channel-bird-deaths-polluting-1569607</a></p>
<p>It is feared several thousand birds, mainly Guillemots, have become virtually paralysed after swimming into the ‘waxy’ substance in the Channel</p>
<p>One of the injured seabirds</p>
<p><img src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&amp;ik=9ed62dbd70&amp;view=att&amp;th=13d3abcb51e71521&amp;attid=0.1&amp;disp=emb&amp;zw&amp;atsh=1" border="0" alt="One of the injured seabirds" width="890" height="594" /></p>
<p>RSPCA/PA</p>
<p>A  rogue cargo ship is the likely cause of an environmental disaster that  has left hundreds of birds dead after it flushed a glue-like pollutant  into the sea, it was claimed today.</p>
<p>Officials  from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency are awaiting the results of  urgent tests to establish what the mystery substance is before launching  a hunt for an offending vessel.</p>
<p>The  MCA meanwhile launched a pollution surveillance aircraft to survey the  English Channel while the Royal Navy and RAF were on standby to help.</p>
<p>Experts  said the leading theory for the cause of the pollution is that an oil  residue was illegally flushed from a ship’s cargo tanks out at sea to  save the time or costs of emptying it in port.</p>
<p>It was feared several thousand birds, mainly Guillemots, have become virtually paralysed after swimming into the ‘waxy’ substance in the Channel.</p>
<p>The substance, believed to be palm oil, has glued the birds’ feathers and wings together, preventing them from flying.</p>
<p>There are also mounting fears that a 25,000-strong population of Auks off the Dorset coast may perish in the ‘ecocide’.</p>
<p>Over  the last 48 hours hundreds of seabirds have been washed ashore on  beaches in West Sussex, Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Dorset, Devon and  Cornwall.</p>
<p>Wildlife  experts have so far rescued more than 250 birds alive but as time goes  by it is feared the majority of birds now found will be dead.</p>
<p>Because  they are unable to take off or preen themselves, the creatures are at  grave risk of freezing to death as they are washed onto the windswept  beaches.</p>
<p><img src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&amp;ik=9ed62dbd70&amp;view=att&amp;th=13d3abcb51e71521&amp;attid=0.2&amp;disp=emb&amp;zw&amp;atsh=1" border="0" alt="One of the injured seabirds" width="890" height="1024" /></p>
<p>One of the injured seabirds</p>
<p>RSPCA/PA</p>
<p>Chris Packham, presenter of BBC’s Springwatch and Autumnwatch,  said: “What’s particularly frightening is that hundreds have been  picked up on the beach, there could be very many more which have died  and been lost at sea.</p>
<p>“The  birds that have been found up until now are probably the tip if the  iceberg. There could be thousands out there that have died in this.”</p>
<p>Dr Simon Boxall, an oceanographer at the University of Southampton, said: “The substance has the right characteristics to be palm oil.</p>
<p>“We move a lot of it around the world and transport it in tens of thousands of tonnes at a time.</p>
<p>“The  fact this has affected such a wide area implies there is a reasonably  large amount in the sea which is moving up the Channel and implies there  has been a spill.</p>
<p>“It is likely a ship has delivered some palm oil but needed to deposit residue from the tanks.</p>
<p>“It  takes time to do so and costs money so a few rogue ships have been  known to flush out its tanks in the open sea, which can be several  hundred tonnes.</p>
<p>“Each  ship has identification saying where it is has come from, going to, and  what cargo it is carrying, so the authorities could narrow this down to  half a dozen ships.”</p>
<p>Although  the majority of the birds affected are guillemots as they spend most of  their life on the surface of the sea, other species that have been  coated in the substance have been razorbills, kittiwakes, egrets and a  baby puffin.</p>
<p>Most of the rescued birds have been recovered along a 25 mile section of coast at Chesil Beach and the Isle of Portland in Dorset.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflash/" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p>More  than 120 of them have been taken to an RSPCA centre to be cleaned using  a mixture of water and margarine but at least 50 were found dead.</p>
<p>Nearly 100 birds have been rescued from beaches in Torquay, Brixham, Teignmouth and Salcombe in Devon.</p>
<p>Mark Smith, of the Dorset Wildlife Trust, has been leading an army of 18 staff in the search for birds along Chesil Beach.</p>
<p>He said: “There are 25,000 auks off Dorset so the potential number of birds involved in this could be huge.</p>
<p>“This is potentially quite a big environmental disaster.</p>
<p>“Unfortunately as time goes by the proportion of birds that we are find are dead than alive.</p>
<p>“Whatever the substance is, it feels like a very sticky glue that has clumped the feathers together.</p>
<p>“The birds are left almost paralysed. They can’t fly or preen themselves and just go along with the tide and winds until they hit the shore.</p>
<p>“We have found many birds stuck to the pebbles on the beach while others have pebbles stuck to their feathers.</p>
<p>“Most  of the dead ones have frozen to death from where they have been unable  to dry their feathers and then exposed to cold winds while stranded on  the beach.”</p>
<p>The  Environment Agency is currently testing a sample of the substance in  order to confirm exactly what it is and, potentially, where it came  from.</p>
<p>Fred Caygill, spokesman for the MCA, said: ”Ships do clean their tanks at sea.</p>
<p>“In some cases it can be done legitimately and in other cases it can breach the maritime pollution regulations.</p>
<p>“We will continue to monitor this situation and await the results of the analysis of the product before we respond.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shipsairpollution.cleartheair.org.hk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2536</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
